![]() This is not possible via the app, and neither is setting the Wi-Fi network. Setup requires logging into a Pico account. Supported by videos and step-by-step instructions, the VR headset including the gaming area is quickly set up. Setting up the Pico 4 is still almost the same as setting up a Quest 2 (review). …but the user account and WLAN cannot be configured via the app.live in an area where Pico doesn’t (yet) offer consumer support,.need color passthrough for augmented reality,.value a stable, comfortable headset fit,.clearly notice the irregular screen-door effect,.need an overall clear, clean, and smooth image,.If you trust your data with Bytedance more than Meta, if you can live with the risk of various bugs, and if you aren’t concerned with the aforementioned problems, the Pico 4 is a viable alternative to the Quest 2. The Pico Store grows very slowly, but Wi-Fi streaming and streaming via USB-C cable from Steam worked well enough for me – if there are no bugs like broken sound transmission. Tracking and the new VR controllers work very well. However, a suboptimal head strap design immediately negates any comfort gain from the lower weight. The smaller form factor and the significantly lower weight are positives. God-rays, on the other hand, are mostly gone. The image generally appears quite dark with washed-out colors. The screen-door effect is clearly visible, partly because of some kind of “bubbles” or “holes” that appear quite irregularly in the pixel grid. On the other hand, some kind of smearing or ghosting and reflections in areas with high contrast plague the image. The higher resolution and the larger field of view are hardly noticeable in practice. Many advantages of the Pico 4 only exist on paper. ![]() ![]() Pico 4 review conclusion: Not yet a finished VR headset.Field of view, sweet spot, and interpupillary distance.Resolution, colors, refresh rate, and color passthrough.Pico 4 is less suitable for you if you ….
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |